Did Jesus Exist?

Did Jesus Exist?

The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

eBook - 2012
Average Rating:
Rate this:
For years Bart Ehrman has been routinely bombarded with one question: Did Jesus Exist? As a leading Bible expert, fans and critics alike have sent letters, emails, posted blogs, and questioned Ehrman during interviews wanting his opinion about this nagging question that has become a conspiracy theorist cottage industry the world over. The idea that the character of Jesus was an invention of the early church—and later a tool of control employed by the Roman Catholic Church—is a widely held belief and Ehrman has decided it’s time to put the issue to rest. Yes, the historical Jesus of Nazareth did exist. Known as a master explainer with deep knowledge of the field, Ehrman methodically demolishes both the scholarly and popular “mythicist” arguments against the existence of Jesus. Marshaling evidence from within the Bible and the wider historical record of the ancient world, Ehrman tackles the key issues that surround the popular mythologies associated with Jesus and the early Christian movement. Throughout Did Jesus Exist? Ehrman establishes the criterion for any genuine historical investigation and provides a robust defense of the methods required to discover the Jesus of history. Those committed to the “non-existence” theory will need to read this formidable scholar’s counter argument while the more traditionally minded will enthusiastically support Ehrman’s definitive answer to the question. Perfect for the vigorous online debating community, this eBook original will be a must read for anyone interested in Jesus, the Bible, and the birth of Christianity.
Publisher: [Place of publication not identified] : HarperCollins, 2012
Edition: 1st ed
ISBN: 9780062089946
Characteristics: 1 online resource
Additional Contributors: OverDrive, Inc


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Mar 15, 2018

I will cheerfully admit that I adored this book. After reading some of the books written by atheists about Jesus, even I get grumpy - and I don't think there was anything unique about him except that his fan club got the upper hand. (Not unlike Star Wars vs. Babylon 5, there.) Atheists who subscribe to the mythicist school - the one that argues there was no historical Jesus - tend to be the smuggest and most annoying of all in tone, but until recently I didn't have any tools to refute them.

Now I do. Ehrman, who is himself agnostic, takes on the mythicist school of thought directly in this volume and mounts multiple convincing arguments against the mythicists. He divides the book into sections: first addressing the evidence that there was a historical Jesus, second debunking the arguments against it, and then going on into whether it matters.

If you've read others of Ehrman's books, a lot of his citations will be familiar. Again, this is because there is a limited amount of early days' data available on the topic. There are only so many early manuscripts, although they are still eagerly sought. There are only so many people who were even capable of producing these documents, and honestly the amount of information we have is fairly important in and of itself - we don't have much more for many important figures.

Don't let the familiarity of the documentation and arguments bore you. Ehrman is making a case that is being presented by mythicists as impossible to make, and showing where they are missing information, arguing from special cases, or even just ignorant - he does point out a few incredibly specious arguments. I am convinced that Jesus was a historical figure by his points. It's worth reading to discover if you are, too. Four of five stars.

Jan 25, 2017


Your comment is not a particularly strong one. What exactly in Ehrman's book is "not particularly good" according to you? Blanket statements like that serve no purpose other than obfuscate the lack of any logical arguments that could shed light on the author's thesis. Can you give an example of "lies" you found in it? What problems of logic did you find?

Please, next time you write a comment ask yourself what does it contribute to the reader's knowledge.

Dec 27, 2015

Not a particularly good book. Full of lies and faulty logic. Shame on Ehrman for writing this junk

Oct 19, 2013

This is a tremendous book. Ehrman is an historian who takes a professional and balanced look at the evidence surrounding the controversy of whether or not a man (Jesus) actually physically existed. This book is well written and interesting. It provides an extensive bibliography both pro and con about Jesus' existence. A great starting point for those with limited background on the subject. Well worth the read.


Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further


Subject Headings


Find it at MARINet

To Top